AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on November 23, 2004, doi:10.1177/0363546504264895
This version was published on December 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/8/1842    most recent
0363546504264895v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chondral/cartilage
Right arrow Animal studies
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 32:1842-1848 (2004)
© 2004 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Effects of Small Incongruities in a Sheep Model of Osteochondral Autografting

Fred S. Huang, MD*, Peter T. Simonian, MD{dagger}, Anthony G. Norman{ddagger} and John M. Clark, MD, PhD{ddagger},§

From the * Valley Orthopaedic Associates, Renton, Washington, {dagger} Simonian Sports Medicine Clinic, Fresno, California, and {ddagger} Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

§ Address correspondence to John M. Clark, MD, PhD, Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific, Box 356500, Seattle, WA 98195-6500 (e-mail: drclark{at}u.washington.edu).

Background: Exact reconstruction of an osteochondral defect by autogenous transplantation (mosaicplasty) is difficult given the variation in joint surface contour. Clinical and experimental studies do not show the extent to which incongruity can be tolerated in autografting.

Hypothesis: Grafted articular cartilage will hypertrophy to correct the incongruity created by recession of the transplanted surface.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: To test the response of grafts to incongruities, osteochondral autografts were transplanted from the trochlea to the femoral condyle in adult male sheep stifle joints. In groups of 6 animals, graft surfaces were placed flush, countersunk 1 mm or countersunk 2 mm, then histologically analyzed 6 weeks after surgery. Cartilage thickness, condition of the articular surfaces, and preservation of hyaline characteristics were the primary features compared.

Results: Bony union, vascularization, and new bone formation were present in all grafts. Cartilage-to-cartilage healing did not occur. In flush specimens, cartilage changed minimally in thickness and histologic architecture. The specimens countersunk 1 mm demonstrated significant cartilage thickening (54.7% increase, P <.05). Chondrocyte hyperplasia, tidemark advancement, and vascular invasion occurred at the chondroosseous junction, and the surface remained smooth. Cartilage necrosis and fibrous overgrowth were observed in all grafts countersunk 2 mm.

Conclusions: Minimally countersunk autografts possess a capacity for remodeling that can correct initial incongruities while preserving hyaline characteristics. Grafts placed deeper do not restore the contour or composition of the original articular surface.

Clinical Relevance: If preservation of normal hyaline cartilage is the objective, thin grafted articular cartilage can remodel, but the tolerance for incongruity is limited and probably less than that reported for an intra-articular fracture.

Key Words: articular cartilage • knee • autografting • transplantation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. Patil, W. Butcher, D. D. D'Lima, N. Steklov, W. D. Bugbee, and H. R. Hoenecke
Effect of Osteochondral Graft Insertion Forces on Chondrocyte Viability
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1726 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. E. Scranton Jr, C. C. Frey, and K. S. Feder
Outcome of osteochondral autograft transplantation for type-V cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 614 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.