|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||



From the
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the
Department of Pathology, the
Department of Microbiology, and the || Department of Health Sciences, University of South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama
* Address correspondence and reprint requests to Albert W. Pearsall, IV, MD, Director, Section of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2451 Fillingim Street, Mobile, AL 36617.
Purpose: To evaluate cell viability and matrix characteristics of refrigerated osteochondral allografts implanted up to 44 days after harvest.
Methods: Sixteen refrigerated allografts underwent histologic and ultrastructural examination and fluorescence excitation analysis prior to implantation. The average size of the graft implanted was 6.2 cm2 (±3.4 cm2). Refrigerated allografts averaged 30 days (range, 17 to 44 days) from donor expiration to implantation. Nine specimens underwent cell viability testing. The percent viability of refrigerated allografts prior to implantation averaged 67%.
Results: No significant correlations were noted between histologic score, electron microscopy score, matrix staining percent (MSP) score, and viability. When time to implantation was assessed, an inverse correlation was noted with MSP score (r = .539) (P < 0.05), indicating less matrix staining in grafts refrigerated longer after harvest.
Conclusion: The current data indicate that refrigerated osteochondral allografts can be maintained for up to 44 days with average chondrocyte viability of 67%.
Key Words: allograft cartilage viability knee osteochondral
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Lightfoot, J. Martin, and A. Amendola Fluorescent Viability Stains Overestimate Chondrocyte Viability in Osteoarticular Allografts Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1817 - 1823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Davidson, D. W. Rivenburgh, P. E. Dawson, and R. Rozin Clinical, Histologic, and Radiographic Outcomes of Distal Femoral Resurfacing With Hypothermically Stored Osteoarticular Allografts Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1082 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Williams III, A. S. Ranawat, H. G. Potter, T. Carter, and R. F. Warren Fresh Stored Allografts for the Treatment of Osteochondral Defects of the Knee J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2007; 89(4): 718 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. McCulloch, R. W. Kang, M. H. Sobhy, J. K. Hayden, and B. J. Cole Prospective Evaluation of Prolonged Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2007; 35(3): 411 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Glenn Jr, E. C. McCarty, H. G. Potter, S. F. Juliao, J. D. Gordon, and K. P. Spindler Comparison of Fresh Osteochondral Autografts and Allografts: A Canine Model Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2006; 34(7): 1084 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Pennock, C. M. Robertson, F. Wagner, F. L. Harwood, W. D. Bugbee, and D. Amiel Does Subchondral Bone Affect the Fate of Osteochondral Allografts During Storage? Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 586 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Allen, C. M. Robertson, A. T. Pennock, W. D. Bugbee, F. L. Harwood, V. W. Wong, A. C. Chen, R. L. Sah, and D. Amiel Analysis of Stored Osteochondral Allografts at the Time of Surgical Implantation Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2005; 33(10): 1479 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |